College Grad or Indentured Servant?
ACLU: How Big a Deal is H.R. 347, The “Criminalizing Protest” Bill?
An article by the ACLU, examining the new “Trespass Bill” just signed into law.
For months, a massive federal settlement with big Wall Street banks over their role in the mortgage crisis has been in the offing. The rumored details have always given progressives heartburn: civil immunity, no investigations, inadequate help for homeowners and a small penalty for the banks. Now, on the eve President Obama’s State of the Union address—in which he plans to further advance a populist message against big money and income inequality—the deal may be here, and it’s every bit as ugly as progressives feared.
The Associated Press reports that a proposed deal could be announced within weeks. Five banks—Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial (formerly GMAC)—would pay the federal government $25 billion. About $17 billion would be used to reduce the principal that some struggling homeowners owe, $5 billion more would be used for future federal and state programs and $3 billion would be used to help homeowners refinance at 5.25 percent. Civil immunity would be granted to the banks for any role in foreclosure fraud, and there would be no investigations.
Many progressive groups have begun a massive petition drive to push back against the settlement and demand fair investigations. Moreover, attorneys general in California, New York, Delaware, Nevada and Massachusetts have previously said they won’t be a part of any deal that offers civil immunity. So the deal is far from done—but it’s certainly moving towards an undesirable conclusion. We’ll have plenty more in this space all week.
(via boldprogressives)
this is happening now today right now…at this moment…oh my !!!
GOP fuels the gas problem. Wall Street fueling the problem. Goldman Sachs speculation in oil commodities increasing the cost of gas by $.80 per gallon.
Woohoo FREE MARKET deregulation at work! All hail goldman squid.
Why shut down the West Coast Ports?
The ports play a pivotal role in the flow and growth of capital for the 1% in this country and internationally. For that reason alone it is the ideal place to disrupt their profit machine. The workers on these ports have always understood that; they have consistently staged shutdowns for political reasons, honored community picket lines, and led the labor movement. A general disruption of commerce, in protest of the nationally coordinated attacks on Occupy movements alone is warranted, but additionally, the specifically targeted attacks on workers at these ports by the 1% further necessitate this call to action. Truck drivers on ports in southern California were fired in a union busting attack when they attempted an organizing campaign. Workers, especially in the Latino community, are organizing a “stay away” to withhold labor on December 12, the day of Our Virgin Of Guadalupe. Occupy LA voted to also blockade the SSA ports, owned by Goldman Sachs. In solidarity, Occupy Oakland voted unanimously to expand this call to all of the West Coast ports. After tens of thousands shut down the port of Oakland in solidarity with ILWU Local 21 in Longview, Washington’s struggle against EGT, the first ship still approaches the port. The workers and their families have been beaten, pepper sprayed, and arrested by police armed with tear gas, rubber and live ammunitions, in order to protect EGT’s flow of capital. The power of the workers to act collectively to disrupt production on the ports will be seriously compromised by any penetration of the ILWU’s West Coast stronghold. If EGT is successful, other ports may follow and these attacks could spread to other worker organizations. As the ILWU motto states, “An injury to one is an injury to all!” We must show that workers will not tolerate attacks on ourselves, our families, or our communities. We will maintain our collective power and right to organize. Why are the Occupy movements involved in these struggles? The 1% has been able to write and pass labor laws that are designed to restrict the amount of action that can legally be taken by a union. Most union officials today refuse to challenge those laws. Officially, they will distance themselves from actions that may lead to legal attacks as the ILWU International Office is currently, publicly doing. Whether this is due to leadership corrupted by the system or fear of litigation they believe will weaken their union, it is the responsibility of rank and file workers and their allies to escalate the labor struggle. Occupy can spearhead this movement. We are working people. We are here to fight the disparity of our system as is/should be the intent of organized labor. We have no leaders to jail, sue, intimidate or corrupt. We organize, we mobilize, we fight, we occupy, we win!
UPDATE: Keep it up! Since I first posted this, it has received 10,000 more signatures!
(via glitchthemachine)
BERNIE SANDERS AIMS TO OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED v. FEC, BUT HE NEEDS OUR HELP! He is proposing a constitutional amendment entitled the Saving American Democracy Amendment, which states that:
- Corporations are not persons with constitutional rights equal to real people.
- Corporations are subject to regulation by the people.
- Corporations may not make campaign contributions.
- Congress and states have the power to regulate campaign finances.
SIGN THE PETITION NOW TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT!!!!
Within our current framework, this has great potential to make a huge step forward in realigning power.
PLEASE REBLOG THIS EVERYWHERE!
Profits over Human Needs
Mom just got back from D.C. and told me how she shook hands with a bunch of C.E.O.s that gave themselves million dollar bonuses and met a very interesting army vet all in the same day.
The army vet was talking to her on the plane about how our soldiers hardly ever use new upgraded gear to protect themselves during the wars overseas because lots of congressmen have shares in the companies who produce the old materials and they don’t want the companies who produce the better gear to make money.
It might be a bit hard to understand because I’m terrible at explaining, but essentially: the government honestly doesn’t care about our soldiers’ safety and protection. They truly just want to make sure they gain money from their shares in these old companies, so they always vote to keep using the old gear instead of investing in better protection for our soldiers.
Amoral profit schemes will always lead to this. As a system, capitalism does what it is designed to do. The problem is that it is working too well and not balanced. It is like all the disturbing futuristic robot movies you see about machines taking over after we have made them so sophisticated. The system has learned. Corporations have becomes huge machines run off of the man power. We’ve surpassed the point of capitalism giving us the boost to innovate. Now it has rapidly progressed to form monopolies and find weak spots to exploit without forethought of human need or long-term environmental damages.
It’s hard to write off new property…and it’s really hard to avoid the city center :\
(via glitchthemachine)
I love this sign! “When INJUSTICE becomes LAW, RESISTANCE becomes DUTY”
(via thepeoplesrecord)
Source: el-pibe-josi
Occupy Denver hearing: Police officer made fake Twitter account to harass occupation "idiots"
Yesterday’s hearing for an injunction on behalf of Occupy Denver came with an unfair share of sarcasm and surprises, but one stood out far beyond the others: While one document from Officer James Henning suggested a plan to stay the current course until the occupation “wears itself out,” another found a police officer admitting to the creation of a fake Twitter account for the sole purpose of harassing the occupiers, referred to as “idiots.” [read more]
It is interesting how Oakland PD’s policy handbook says that police are not to enter a group of people to pull people out for arrest. I wonder if NYPD has a similar policy. Anyone have a link to NYPD internal policy for conduct and procedure?
I will never get over the fact that the same tactics that were used by the Civil Rights movement, are now branded as “Violent.” The excesses of force will never end, but we will never forget.
Police arrest my brother Zelig Stern at Occupy Wall Street this morning
(via hauntofhorrorcomics)
Source: dreamrimbaud

![[SIGN THE PETITION]
For months, a massive federal settlement with big Wall Street banks over their role in the mortgage crisis has been in the offing. The rumored details have always given progressives heartburn: civil immunity, no investigations, inadequate help for homeowners and a small penalty for the banks. Now, on the eve President Obama’s State of the Union address—in which he plans to further advance a populist message against big money and income inequality—the deal may be here, and it’s every bit as ugly as progressives feared.
The Associated Press reports that a proposed deal could be announced within weeks. Five banks—Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial (formerly GMAC)—would pay the federal government $25 billion. About $17 billion would be used to reduce the principal that some struggling homeowners owe, $5 billion more would be used for future federal and state programs and $3 billion would be used to help homeowners refinance at 5.25 percent. Civil immunity would be granted to the banks for any role in foreclosure fraud, and there would be no investigations.
[Read More]
Many progressive groups have begun a massive petition drive to push back against the settlement and demand fair investigations. Moreover, attorneys general in California, New York, Delaware, Nevada and Massachusetts have previously said they won’t be a part of any deal that offers civil immunity.
So the deal is far from done—but it’s certainly moving towards an undesirable conclusion. We’ll have plenty more in this space all week.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lya9oaNXWf1r8hswmo1_1280.jpg)


