The shocking truth about the crackdown on Occupy

By Naomi Wolf

Why this massive mobilisation against these not-yet-fully-articulated, unarmed, inchoate people? After all, protesters against the war in Iraq, Tea Party rallies and others have all proceeded without this coordinated crackdown. Is it really the camping? As I write, two hundred young people, with sleeping bags, suitcases and even folding chairs, are still camping out all night and day outside of NBC on public sidewalks – under the benevolent eye of an NYPD cop – awaiting Saturday Night Live tickets, so surely the camping is not the issue. I was still deeply puzzled as to why OWS, this hapless, hopeful band, would call out a violent federal response.

That is, until I found out what it was that OWS actually wanted.

The mainstream media was declaring continually “OWS has no message”. Frustrated, I simply asked them. I began soliciting online “What is it you want?” answers from Occupy. In the first 15 minutes, I received 100 answers. These were truly eye-opening.

The No 1 agenda item: get the money out of politics. Most often cited was legislation to blunt the effect of the Citizens United ruling, which lets boundless sums enter the campaign process. No 2: reform the banking system to prevent fraud and manipulation, with the most frequent item being to restore the Glass-Steagall Act – the Depression-era law, done away with by President Clinton, that separates investment banks from commercial banks. This law would correct the conditions for the recent crisis, as investment banks could not take risks for profit that create kale derivatives out of thin air, and wipe out the commercial and savings banks.

No 3 was the most clarifying: draft laws against the little-known loophole that currently allows members of Congress to pass legislation affecting Delaware-based corporations in which they themselves are investors.

When I saw this list – and especially the last agenda item – the scales fell from my eyes. Of course, these unarmed people would be having the shit kicked out of them.

For the terrible insight to take away from news that the Department of Homeland Security coordinated a violent crackdown is that the DHS does not freelance. The DHS cannot say, on its own initiative, “we are going after these scruffy hippies”. Rather, DHS is answerable up a chain of command: first, to New York Representative Peter King, head of the House homeland security subcommittee, who naturally is influenced by his fellow congressmen and women’s wishes and interests. And the DHS answers directly, above King, to the president (who was conveniently in Australia at the time).

In other words, for the DHS to be on a call with mayors, the logic of its chain of command and accountability implies that congressional overseers, with the blessing of the White House, told the DHS to authorise mayors to order their police forces – pumped up with millions of dollars of hardware and training from the DHS – to make war on peaceful citizens.

But wait: why on earth would Congress advise violent militarised reactions against its own peaceful constituents? The answer is straightforward: in recent years, members of Congress have started entering the system as members of the middle class (or upper middle class) – but they are leaving DC privy to vast personal wealth, as we see from the “scandal” of presidential contender Newt Gingrich’s having been paid $1.8m for a few hours’ “consulting” to special interests. The inflated fees to lawmakers who turn lobbyists are common knowledge, but the notion that congressmen and women are legislating their own companies’ profitsis less widely known – and if the books were to be opened, they would surely reveal corruption on a Wall Street spectrum. Indeed, we do already know that congresspeople are massively profiting from trading on non-public information they have on companies about which they are legislating – a form of insider trading that sent Martha Stewart to jail.

Since Occupy is heavily surveilled and infiltrated, it is likely that the DHS and police informers are aware, before Occupy itself is, what its emerging agenda is going to look like. If legislating away lobbyists’ privileges to earn boundless fees once they are close to the legislative process, reforming the banks so they can’t suck money out of fake derivatives products, and, most critically, opening the books on a system that allowed members of Congress to profit personally – and immensely – from their own legislation, are two beats away from the grasp of an electorally organised Occupy movement … well, you will call out the troops on stopping that advance.

So, when you connect the dots, properly understood, what happened this week is the first battle in a civil war; a civil war in which, for now, only one side is choosing violence. It is a battle in which members of Congress, with the collusion of the American president, sent violent, organised suppression against the people they are supposed to represent. Occupy has touched the third rail: personal congressional profits streams. Even though they are, as yet, unaware of what the implications of their movement are, those threatened by the stirrings of their dreams of reform are not.

Sadly, Americans this week have come one step closer to being true brothers and sisters of the protesters in Tahrir Square. Like them, our own national leaders, who likely see their own personal wealth under threat from transparency and reform, are now making war upon us.

  1. clairenyquist reblogged this from occupyonline
  2. digitalwasteland reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  3. josieng reblogged this from summerofshred
  4. elfboi reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  5. driedfluidsofamore reblogged this from fucknobigbrother
  6. heraclitorus reblogged this from frozenrevolutionary
  7. hermione666 reblogged this from occupyonline
  8. skyghe reblogged this from planetsedge
  9. starcolouring reblogged this from occupyonline and added:
    By Naomi Wolf Why this massive mobilisation against these not-yet-fully-articulated, unarmed, inchoate people? After...
  10. williamnewton reblogged this from occupyonline
  11. climbinglyell reblogged this from occupyonline
  12. izzfromlongago reblogged this from fucknobigbrother and added:
    By Naomi Wolf Why this massive mobilisation against these not-yet-fully-articulated, unarmed, inchoate people? After...
  13. burt79 reblogged this from occupyonline
  14. planetsedge reblogged this from littlegrenades
  15. 38milestograceland reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  16. gorgon-heart reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  17. littlegrenades reblogged this from frozenrevolutionary
  18. serenitysentinel reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  19. amodernmanifesto reblogged this from mostmodernist
  20. mostmodernist reblogged this from occupyonline
  21. brittany821 reblogged this from occupyonline
  22. fabulousskeptic reblogged this from occupyonline
  23. chrysalisofreality reblogged this from btgwpersonalblog and added:
    Read this.
  24. madcameljockey reblogged this from centralpath
  25. pandahspunk reblogged this from occupyonline
  26. centralpath reblogged this from occupyonline
  27. occupythegalaxy reblogged this from occupyonline